Top 10 Results
The Gettier problem, in the field of epistemology, is a landmark philosophical problem concerning our understanding of descriptive knowledge. Attributed to American philosopher Edmund Gettier, Gettier-type counterexamples (called “Gettier-cases”) challenge the long-held justified true belief (JTB) account of knowledge.
Gettier problems or cases are named in honor of the American philosopher Edmund Gettier, who discovered them in 1963. They function as challenges to the philosophical tradition of defining knowledge of a proposition as justified true belief in that proposition.
The expression ‘the Gettier problem’ refers to one or another problem exposed by Edmund Gettier when discussing the relation between several examples that he constructed and analyses of knowing advanced by various philosophers, including Plato in the Theatetus.
The Gettier problem has long been seen as a paradigmatic exemplification of a way in which much analytic philosophy has pursued its conceptual and definitional ends – a pursuit that has often been treated as distinctive and even constitutive of analytic philosophy.
The Gettier problem is considered a problem in modern epistemology issuing from counter-examples to the definition of knowledge as justified true belief (JTB).
The Gettier Problem is Edmund Gettier’s response to Plato’s theory of knowledge observed in his work “Theaetetus.” It is one of the most popular and critical philosophical problems of epistemology. It concerns the way we understand descriptive or general knowledge.
The Gettier Problem No Longer a Problem Lukasz Lozanski claims to know why Edmund Gettier was unjustified. In 1963, Edmund Gettier challenged the whole notion of what constitutes knowledge. Until he published a short paper that year called ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, it was widely accepted that knowledge was justified true belief.
BlueBanana 920 The Gettier problem is, in a general form, as follows: a person has a false belief a, from which a conclusion b is drawn. It is then found out that a was false, yet b is true (although only when interpreted in some different way).
A Solution to the Gettier Problem Keota Fields Problem cases by Edmund Gettier1 and others2, intended to undermine the sufficiency of the three traditional conditions for knowledge, have been discussed extensively in the philosophical literature. But I believe they suffer from heretofore unnoticed flaws that undermines their effectiveness.
EDMUND GETTIER Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. It stimulated a renewed effort, still ongoing, to clarify exactly what knowledge comprises. _____
1.Baffling Phenomena and Other Studies in
Rescher then applies this repair to the case of the Gettier Problem, arguing that the historical analysis of knowledge – viz. that knowledge is justified true belief – should be weakened to claim no more than that standardly knowledge is justified true …
Published Date: 2011-03-11T08:02:00.0000000Z
|1 PHILOSOPHY – Epistemology: Analyzing Knowledge #1 (The Gettier Problem) [HD]|
|Is knowledge the same as justified true belief? In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel (University of Toronto) discusses a Gettier case, a scenario in which someone has justified true belief but not knowledge. We’ll look at a Gettier case from Edmund Gettier’s famous 1963 paper on this topic, and a structurally similar case from …|
|Watch Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lB-XJjmvoE|
The Gettier problem, in the field of epistemology, is a landmark philosophical problem concerning our understanding of descriptive knowledge. Attributed…
known as the Gettier problem. Gettier was educated at Cornell University, where his mentors included Max Black and Norman Malcolm. Gettier was originally…
of the earliest suggested replies to Gettier, and perhaps the most intuitive ways to respond to the Gettier problem, is the "no false premises" response…